Almost a break from Science...

Just taking a break from all the science to share a couple of other things I recently learned...

1. GOP (the nickname for the Republican National Party) stands for the Grand Ol' Party... That leads me to wonder why the Democrat National Party does not have a nickname, or at least one that is published...

B) Nash, the guy who gave us the Donkey and Elephant for the National Political Parties, is also the guy who gave us the pictures for 'Twas the Night Before Christmas...

3. This is purely hypothetical, but too ironic to pass up... Jurassic Park promotes a anti-homosexual lifestyle... Okay, I know that deserves an explanation... If you have read the book or seen the movie, then the fact that all the dinosaurs in the park were female, by human manipulation (i.e. unnatural)... Also pointed out was the fact that the DNA sequencing were incomplete (Hmm... Subtle hinting that maybe they should have stopped?) and to get passed this they filled in the missing gaps with Amphibian DNA (Kind of weird that it is popularly theorized that Dinosaurs came from birds and they used Amphibians)... Now introduce the Chaotic Theorist Ian Malcolm... "Life will find a way"... And it did (otherwise the movie and book would have been completely boring) and Dr. Grant explains it later on after finding the raptor's nest (different places depending on if you are in the book or watching the movie) filled with broken eggs... He explains that there are some frogs KNOWN (I put emphasis on this word because this is observable) to spontaneously change genders if it is in a mono-gender environment... Conclusion? Even nature knows that a single gender environment is unnatural and found a way to compensate for it...

Okay maybe I read too much into the last one, but I did not even bring this to my own attention... I was discussing timelines with an evolutionist and he brought up Jurassic Park as an example, then the idea popped into my head...

Well, I hope you learned something today, if not from here, then from somewhere...

Do not let Pluto happen again...

Just thought I would share my latest three arguments against evolution...


1. The Gallopogos Island Ecosystem...
2. Ring Species...
3. The Scientific Method...


1. This is my new favorite pet argument...

Balanced food supply versus animal life...
A variety of wildlife co-existing...
No observable variation to these conditions, both presently and archeologically (or however that is spelt)...
Kind of opposes the evolutionary theory that there is always change going on (Uniformtarnism) and Natural Selection producing New animals...

2. Speaking of Natural Selection and New Animals... This just in... Ring Species...

I just was informed by an evolutionist that I should read up on ring species and see what I think... So I did, and you know what? I love ring species... God is so smart...

So what is a ring specie? Simply put... You had one animal, which interbreeded with a neighboring variety of that animal, which produces a new variety... This process is repeated over and over... Eventually the animal that is produced will not be able to interbreed with the original variety of that animal...

So what does this have to do with God? The Bible teaches that all living things reproduce after their own kind... This prevents something known as genetic overload, by mixing the genetics of different animals... Ring species show that there is a limit (imposed naturally in nature) to interbreeding)... And even the animal at the beginning is still the same animal at the end, just a different variety (examples? Finches at Gallopogos or the Gull - You can look that one up at Wikipedia)...

3. The Scientific Method... Something must be testable with observational support...

What about it is observable? We can see bacteria evolving into more bacteria... We can see life producing life... We see a tree make a tree and a rabbit produce a rabbit... We can see Natural Selection in action...

What about it is testable? Dating of fossils? --Problem is that we can neither prove nor disprove the validity of these findings... Archeological digs? --Have never disproven the Bible, only supported it... Artifical Selection? -- That plant is still a plant, and wow, we made the snake less venomous, it still is a snake...


I wanted to share these now and spread the news before these arguments go the way of poor Pluto... What do I mean? Well in the past year Pluto was starting to be held up as an evidence against the Big Bang Theory... And see what happened? A bunch of "pop"-scientists decided it was not a planet and so the argument is no longer valid...